Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract in Project Procurement Management

When managing a project that involves procurement, you may feel overwhelmed by all the different types of contracts and which is ideal for you.

One of these is the Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract. This is a type of contract that can actually benefit both the buyer and seller when used appropriately. For one, the CPIF contract motivates the seller to control costs through financial incentives tied to performance.

In this article, we’ll break down exactly how CPIF contracts work so you can confidently use them in your projects. Whether you’re new to procurement in project management or prepping for the PMP exam, you’ll learn everything you need to know about CPIF contracts.

What is Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract in Project Management?

A Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract is a type of contract used in project procurement where the buyer reimburses the seller for all allowable costs incurred plus an incentive fee.

The incentive fee aims to motivate the seller to meet or exceed certain performance objectives set by the buyer, such as finishing early or staying under budget.

In a CPIF contract, the seller is not guaranteed profit. Rather, their incentive fee is adjusted based on their performance against pre-defined criteria. These criteria are agreed upon upfront and written into the contract terms.

Common criteria include schedule, cost, technical performance, and quality. If the seller meets or exceeds the targets, they earn a higher incentive fee. If they underperform, their fee is reduced proportionally.

The incentive fee is calculated using a formula based on the difference between the actual and target cost. There is usually also a minimum and maximum fee defined. This provides a financial incentive for the seller to control costs and optimize performance, while capping the buyer’s liability if the project scope creeps.

Overall, the CPIF contract shares risk between the buyer and seller. The buyer pays the seller’s costs regardless of the outcome but uses incentives to encourage the seller to meet project objectives.

Cost Plus Incentive Fee Performance Criteria

The incentive fee in a CPIF contract depends on the seller meeting certain predefined performance criteria. As the buyer, you will specify these criteria in the contract to align the seller’s incentives with your project objectives.

Typical criteria include schedule, cost, technical performance, and quality metrics. For example, you may offer the seller a higher incentive fee for completing the project ahead of schedule or under budget. Meeting safety, reliability, or testing metrics could also impact their payout.

Be sure to define measurable, attainable criteria. The more precisely you can specify your performance expectations upfront, the better the CPIF contract will motivate the seller’s behavior.

Why use a Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee Contract?

Here are some reasons to use a CPIF contract in project procurement:

Risk Sharing

The incentive fee structure allows for the sharing of risk between the buyer and seller. The buyer takes on the risk of paying all costs, while the seller takes on the risk of meeting performance targets.

Cost Control Incentive

The contract motivates efficient performance as the seller is incentivized to control costs in order to maximize their incentive payout.

Performance Focus

Performance criteria align the seller’s incentives with the buyer’s objectives for schedule, cost, quality, etc. which focuses efforts.

Outcome Flexibility

While the buyer pays for the agreed-upon costs no matter the outcome, the incentive fee provides motivation for the seller to meet desired outcomes.

Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract Formula

The incentive fee in a CPIF contract is calculated using the following formula:

Incentive Fee = (Target Cost – Actual Cost) x Seller’s Share Ratio + Target Fee

Where:

• Target Cost is the estimated cost agreed upon upfront
• Actual Cost is the real total cost incurred
• Seller’s Share Ratio is the percent of savings shared, e.g. 20%
• Target Fee is the expected fee if the target cost is met

This formula incentivizes the seller to minimize actual costs. If costs overrun the target, the incentive fee is reduced proportionally based on the seller’s share ratio. But if costs come under, the seller shares in the savings at an agreed-upon ratio.

The final payment also includes reimbursement of the actual costs incurred. So the total payment is:

Total Payment = Actual Cost + Incentive Fee

Cost Plus Incentive Fee Calculation

Suppose the buyer and seller agree to the following terms:

• Target Cost: $100,000
• Target Fee: $12,000
• Seller’s Share Ratio: 20%
• Minimum Fee: $9,000
• Maximum Fee: $14,000

If the project’s actual cost ends up being $95,000, then the incentive fee is calculated as:

Incentive Fee = (Target Cost – Actual Cost) x Seller’s Share Ratio + Target Fee

= ($100,000 – $95,000) x 20% + $12,000
= $5,000 x 20% + $12,000
= $1,000 + $12,000
= $13,000

Since this falls between the minimum and maximum fees, the final incentive fee is $13,000.

Adding reimbursement of the $95,000 actual costs, the total payment to the seller is:
Total Payment = Actual Cost + Incentive Fee

= $95,000 + $13,000
= $108,000

Conversely, if the actual cost was $120,000, the incentive fee calculation would be:

Incentive Fee = (Target Cost – Actual Cost) x Seller’s Share Ratio + Target Fee

= ($100,000 – $120,000) x 20% + $12,000
= -$4,000 + $12,000
= $8,000

Here, the fee would be adjusted up to the $9,000 minimum. So the total payment would be $129,000.

Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract Advantages and Disadvantages

Let’s look at the advantages and disadvantages of using a Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract

Advantages of Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract

The advantages of using a CPIF contract include:

• Motivates Performance: The incentive fee structure provides strong financial motivation for the seller to meet or beat performance targets like schedule, cost, quality, etc.
• Aligns Interests: The performance criteria align the seller’s incentives with the project objectives most important to the buyer.
• Shared Risk: The buyer takes on the risk of reimbursing all allowable costs, while the seller takes on the risk of meeting performance targets to earn their maximum incentive fee.
• Cost Control: To maximize their incentive payout, the seller is motivated to find ways to deliver the project at a lower cost.
• Outcome Flexibility: The buyer reimburses the seller’s costs regardless of outcome, but uses the incentive to drive seller behavior towards desired results.

Disadvantages of Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract

Here are some disadvantages of a CPIF contract:

• Complex Terms: The cost adjustment calculations and incentive performance criteria can be complicated to model and explain to stakeholders.
• Fee Overruns: If performance targets are greatly exceeded, incentive fees may end up higher than originally budgeted.
• Perverse Incentives: The seller may overly focus on rewarded metrics at the expense of other important outcomes not tied to incentives.
• Subjective Criteria: Basing incentives on subjective or qualitative criteria can lead to disputes over measurement.
• Adversarial Culture: The complicated terms can sometimes foster an adversarial buyer-seller relationship focused on calculating costs and fees rather than collaboration.

When to Use Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract in Project Management

Here are some scenarios where using a CPIF contract may be your best option:

Unclear Scope

When the project scope is not fully defined upfront, a CPIF contract transfers risk to the buyer to pay for any additional work that comes up, while the incentives still encourage cost control.

Schedule Priority

For projects with tight deadlines, CPIF contracts motivate early completion with schedule-based incentive fees. This is useful when meeting the timeline is critical.

Quality Focus

Basing incentives on quality metrics like defect rate, safety, or reliability directs the seller’s focus towards delivering high-quality outcomes rather than the lowest cost.

Unknown Risks

Since the buyer absorbs cost risk, CPIF contracts are useful when there are many unknown risks that could lead to cost overruns down the road.

Resources Not Available

When the buyer lacks the in-house resources and expertise to execute the project, CPIF contracts reduce risk while procuring specialized outside help.

Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract Example

Let’s walk through an example of how a CPIF contract might be utilized for a project.

Suppose a construction company needs to build a new warehouse facility. Due to limited in-house resources, they decide to procure an external construction firm to execute the project using a CPIF contract.

The estimated target cost for the project is $2 million based on the initial plans and scope. However, both parties recognize that the plans may change during construction, so they want to protect against cost overruns. They agree to a target fee of $200,000 for the contractor to account for their profit margin.

The contract terms specify an 80/20 sharing ratio for any cost savings or overruns against the target. This provides an incentive for the contractor to find ways to deliver the project under budget. The maximum fee is capped at $250,000 to limit the total potential payout.

The performance criteria tie the contractor’s incentive fee to meeting project deadlines. For each day early that they complete major milestones, such as foundation poured or building enclosed, they earn an additional $1,000. However, they must also pay penalties for late finish.

During execution, the contractor carefully manages materials ordering and construction sequencing to accelerate the schedule while keeping costs low. They end up finishing the project 10 days ahead of schedule and $50,000 under the $2 million target budget.

Their total incentive fee is calculated as $30,000 based on the cost savings and schedule performance. Adding this to the $200,000 target fee and $1.95 million actual costs, the total payment to the contractor is $2.18 million.

The CPIF contract provided a win-win scenario. The buyer got their warehouse facility on an accelerated timeline while transferring the risk of cost overruns, while the seller earned additional profit by incentivized performance.

Cost Plus Incentive Fee vs Cost Plus Fixed Fee

CPIF contracts and Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts are two common types of cost-reimbursable contracts in project management. There are some key differences:

Fee Structure

The Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract has two components in its fee: a pre-determined target fee and an incentive fee that adjusts based on the seller’s performance against certain criteria.

For example, the incentive fee may increase if the seller completes the project ahead of schedule or under budget.

In contrast, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract has a single fixed fee that is set at the beginning of the contract regardless of the seller’s performance and does not change.

Performance Motivation

The adjustable incentive fee in the CPIF contract provides strong financial motivation for the seller to meet or exceed the performance targets set out in the contract.

By tying the incentive fee to metrics like cost, schedule, quality, safety, etc., the CPIF contract encourages the seller to optimize their performance on dimensions important to the buyer.

The fixed fee structure of the CPFF contract does not incentivize performance, since the seller gets the same fixed fee payout regardless of whether performance targets are met or not.

Risk Profile

CPIF contracts allow for a sharing of risk between the buyer and the seller. The buyer takes on the risk of reimbursing all of the seller’s allowed costs, while the seller takes on the risk of meeting the performance targets in order to earn the maximum incentive fee.

In CPFF contracts, the risk is skewed towards the buyer, since the fee paid to the seller is fixed regardless of performance outcomes.

Contract Administration

Administering a CPIF contract requires careful tracking of performance metrics and complex calculations to adjust the incentive fee based on the seller’s results.

CPFF contracts are generally easier to manage since the fee structure remains constant. However, the CPIF incentives promote active management by the seller to optimize outcomes.

Cost Control Incentive

The adjustable incentive fee in a CPIF contract provides a strong incentive for the seller to identify opportunities to deliver the project at a lower overall cost. By increasing their share of any cost savings through incentive fee adjustments, the seller is motivated to find efficiencies.

On the other hand, the fixed fee structure of a CPFF contract does little to incentivize the seller to control costs.

Cost Plus Incentive Fee vs Cost Plus Award Fee

Similarly, Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) and Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contracts are two incentive-based fee structures for cost-reimbursable contracts. The key differences between them are:

Fee Calculation

The Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract calculates the incentive fee using a defined formula based on the seller’s performance against objective cost or schedule metrics.

For example, the incentive fee may increase based on a share ratio if the seller delivers the project under the target budget.

In contrast, the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract determines the seller’s award fee subjectively based on the buyer’s judgment of the seller’s overall performance. The fee is not tied to specific measurable outcomes.

Performance Criteria

CPIF contracts motivate the seller by tying the incentive fee to predefined performance criteria like cost targets, schedule milestones, quality metrics, safety ratings, etc. These objective metrics allow for calculating formulaic adjustments to the incentive fee.

CPAF contracts use subjective criteria that are assessed qualitatively by the buyer to determine the level of award fee. This provides the buyer more discretion in rating performance.

Strength of Incentives

The direct formula-based relationship between performance metrics and fee adjustments in a CPIF contract provides strong financial incentives for the seller to optimize their performance.

CPAF contracts have more diluted incentives since the award fee is not directly tied to specific metrics. The seller’s fee is dependent on the subjective opinion of the buyer.

Risk Profile

The incentive structure in a CPIF contract allows for a sharing of risk between the buyer and seller. The buyer takes on the risk of covering costs, while the seller has an incentive to meet targets to maximize their fee.

In a CPAF contract, most of the risk is borne by the buyer who has to pay costs as well as the subjective award fee.

Contract Administration

Administering a CPIF contract requires closely tracking performance against the defined objective metrics to calculate incentive fee adjustments.

CPAF contracts rely more on the buyer’s subjective judgment of performance rather than measurable metrics. However, this provides the buyer more discretion in assessing the seller’s work.

Cost Plus Incentive Fee vs Fixed Price Incentive Fee

Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) and Fixed Price Incentive Fee (FPIF) contracts both use incentive structures to motivate contractor performance. However, there are key differences:

Cost Risk Profile

In a Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract, the risk of cost overruns is borne by the buyer, who agrees to reimburse the seller for all allowable costs incurred. The seller’s profit comes from the incentive fee, not from cost savings.

In contrast, in a Fixed Price Incentive Fee (FPIF) contract, the seller assumes the risk of cost overruns up to a negotiated ceiling price. The seller’s profit comes from delivering the project at a lower cost than the pre-defined target cost.

Incentive Fee Calculations

The CPIF contract calculates the incentive fee adjustment using a formula based on the difference between the actual costs incurred and an agreed-upon target cost for the project, along with other performance metrics like schedule or quality.

The FPIF contract incentive fee is determined by sharing the savings between the contractor’s target cost and the ceiling cost according to a pre-set adjustment ratio. The actual costs affect the contractor’s profit margin directly.

Performance Metrics

CPIF contracts commonly incorporate incentives tied to performance metrics like completing milestones on schedule, meeting quality standards, safety ratings, and other technical metrics. The focus is on incentivizing multiple aspects of performance.

FPIF contracts are mostly focused on incentivizing the contractor to control costs in order to maximize their profit margin on the contract.

Price Certainty

Because the buyer reimburses actual costs, CPIF contracts provide less certainty on the overall final price paid. The total incentive fees are also adjustable.

With an FPIF contract, the price is firm up to the ceiling cost, above which the contractor bears overrun risk. This provides greater overall price certainty.

Project Suitability

CPIF contracts are well suited for projects where the scope or execution plan may change, since the buyer covers cost changes. They also incentivize multiple performance metrics beyond just cost.

FPIF contracts fit projects that are well-defined upfront, with the contractor incentivized to deliver efficiently against those pre-defined requirements.

Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract PMP Exam Tips

Understanding Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contracts can help you answer PMP exam questions on procurement management processes like Plan Procurement Management and Control Procurements.

Here are some tips:

• Know that a CPIF contract is a common cost-reimbursable contract type with adjustable incentive fees tied to performance criteria.
• Be able to compare CPIF to other contract types like fixed price and cost plus fixed fee in terms of risk, incentives, complexity, suitability, and more.
• Recognize that CPIF contracts are established as part of Plan Procurements and evaluated/administered in Control Procurements.
• Review the CPIF incentive fee formula and how actual costs versus targets adjust the seller’s profit. Understand sample calculations.
• Pay attention to keywords in questions like “cost incentive,” “cost reimbursable,” “target cost,” “share ratio,” and “performance criteria.”
• For situational questions, consider project characteristics like requirements certainty, risk tolerance, and performance objectives to determine if a CPIF contract fits.

Studying cost-reimbursable and incentive contract structures prepares you to efficiently answer exam questions and apply procurement concepts in real-world project management.

Final Thoughts on Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) Contracts

Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contracts are a valuable procurement model for many project scenarios. The adjustable incentive fee structure provides motivation for sellers to optimize performance on key criteria like schedule and cost.

At the same time, the cost reimbursement aspect reduces risk for buyers on projects with uncertain scope. As a project manager, be sure you understand CPIF contract formulations, advantages and disadvantages, and when this approach may be suitable.

With the right incentives and active contract administration, CPIF contracts can help drive project success through aligned buyer-seller interests. Carefully assessing how to share risks and rewards leads to effective partnerships.

FAQs