Choosing Between Time and Materials or Fixed-Fee Contract Model for Your Project

When starting a new project, choosing the right contract pricing model is crucial for proper planning and budgeting. Two common options are time and materials billing or a fixed fee contract.

With time and materials, you pay an hourly rate for labor plus material costs, making the total price more flexible but also undefined. A fixed-price contract locks in the total project cost upfront as a lump sum.

In this article, we’ll compare time and material vs fixed price contracts to understand how they both work, their differences, and when to use either of them.

Difference Between Fixed Price and Time and Material Contracts

The basic difference between fixed price and time and material contracts is that fixed price contracts set a defined scope of work for a preset price, whereas time and material contracts bill hourly for work with no fixed budget or end date.

Thus the contractor assumes more risk with a fixed price contract while the client takes on more risk with time and materials where costs are harder to predict and subject to fluctuations.

What is Time and Material Contract?

A time and materials contract is a contract pricing model where you pay an hourly rate for labor plus any additional material costs incurred during the project.

Also known as T&M contracts or hourly billing, these open-ended agreements provide more flexibility but less cost certainty.

With time and materials billing, you only pay for the exact hours of work performed and resources used, and the scope can be adjusted as needed without capped costs.

However, the total budget is not defined upfront hence costs can grow with any scope creep or inefficiencies.

Time and materials contracts require close communication and trust between you and the vendor and you must understand the hourly rates and have clearly outlined the project scope, change order process, payment terms, and invoicing procedures.

How Does the Time and Material Contract Work in Practice?

With a time and materials contract, the client pays an hourly rate for labor, plus any expenses incurred. Here’s how it typically works:

The client and contractor agree on hourly rates for personnel based on role, skillset, and experience. Common ranges are $50-$150/hour for developers, $75-$200 for consultants, etc.

The rates are multiplied by actual hours worked and billed weekly or monthly. Some T&M contracts specify a maximum budget cap.

Since requirements often change, the contractor tracks hours spent on scope changes or new features. This allows transparency into how labor costs are accrued.

Expenses like hardware, software, travel, etc. are passed through to the client at cost, sometimes with an agreed-upon markup percentage.

The scope of work evolves iteratively through continuous client-contractor collaboration, and priorities are adjusted as needed without locking into rigid project plans.

If a major new functionality arises, both parties agree on the change in scope and estimated hours. However, pricing remains flexible at the hourly rate.

For the contractor, a T&M contract means absorbing uncertainty in utilization rates. Their profitability depends on booking enough billable hours at good rates.

The client takes on the risk of how efficiently the contractor works. There’s the incentive to closely monitor delivered value for time spent.

Trust and transparency are essential for time and materials engagements and its success depends on open communication and sticking to the agreed-upon scope as projects progress.

What is a Fixed Price Contract?

A fixed price contract is a contract pricing model where the total project cost is locked in upfront as a lump sum or firm fixed price. Also known as fixed-fee contracts, these agreements provide cost certainty but less flexibility.

With a fixed-price contract, the entire project scope, deliverables, and timeline are defined ahead of time allowing you to budget the complete cost and mitigate risk of cost overruns. However, any scope creep or changes mean renegotiating the contract.

Fixed price contracts require detailed project planning and cost estimation upfront. Defining the scope accurately is key to ensuring satisfaction on both sides, and you must outline the project scope, payment terms, change order process, and acceptance criteria clearly in the contract.

How Does the Fixed-Price Model Work in Practice?

Fixed price contracts are widely used across many industries. Here’s an overview of how they typically work:

The client provides the project scope of work, requirements, and specifications upfront. The contractor then estimates the costs to complete the work and proposes a total fixed fee for the project.

After negotiating the details, both parties sign the fixed price agreement. This locks in the project pricing, and sets out an overall budget, payment terms, project timeline, and other contracted deliverables.

The contractor then completes the work per the requirements. The client makes progress payments as agreed milestones are achieved. Common payment structures include 10% down, followed by 50% at a mid-project milestone, and 40% on completion.

If extra work comes up outside the original scope, the client must issue formal change orders to adjust the pricing and contract.

Both parties must approve and sign the changes as unapproved scope creep can turn a fixed-price project into a loss for the contractor.

Once the contracted work is done, the contractor invoices for any remaining fees up to the fixed price total and the client pays the balance owed.

This provides cost certainty for both client and contractor. However, it requires clear requirements, strong project management, open communication, and a thoughtful approach to contract changes to prevent disputes over unexpected work and cost overruns.

Time and Material vs Fixed Price: Feature Comparison

Now let’s compare both contract types head-to-head to fully understand how they differ across different aspects.

Flexibility in Changing Requirements

A major difference between the two contract types is the flexibility to change requirements after the project starts.

With T&M contracts, you can modify the project scope and add new features or tasks even later in the development process.

Since you pay by the hour, any new work can simply be accommodated by paying for the additional time required. This makes T&M well-suited for projects with uncertain or evolving requirements.

In contrast, fixed-price contracts offer little flexibility for changes once the project scope is locked down upfront. Any modifications require renegotiating the contract, increasing costs through change orders.

This rigidity makes it difficult to pivot if new needs emerge. Thus, fixed-price contracts work best when requirements are clearly defined upfront.

Cost Control and Predictability

You also trade off cost certainty with the two approaches. With a fixed price, you know the total project cost upfront after signing the contract which gives you predictability in budgeting and cost control.

However, you take on more risk of cost overruns with T&M since providers bill for time spent regardless of outcomes. This requires close oversight of the work to ensure efficient use of time and resources.

Risk Allocation

The two models also allocate project risks differently between you and the provider. With a fixed-price contract, the provider takes on delivery risk and must absorb any extra costs of meeting the scoped requirements.

But with T&M, you take on the risk of costs escalating if the work takes longer than expected. The provider is less incentivized to work efficiently since they get paid for time spent.

Payment Structure

T&M contracts involve paying hourly or daily rates for labor, plus any expenses incurred. The rates are usually set based on the skill level and experience of each team member, and you only pay for the time and resources used.

With a fixed price model, you pay a single fixed total amount for the full project scope. The provider takes responsibility for managing the labor and expenses within that budget. Payments may be tied to delivery milestones rather than hours worked.

Ownership and Intellectual Property

For ownership of work products and intellectual property (IP), T&M contracts are generally considered “work for hire” with IP rights transferring to the client once paid for.

But fixed price contracts can vary on IP – you’ll want to negotiate ownership of custom code, designs, writing, etc. upfront as the provider may retain certain rights if not explicitly transferred in the contract.

Accountability and Transparency

T&M provides transparency into the work being performed and time spent via detailed invoices. However, the provider has less accountability for delivering outcomes on time and within budget.

Conversely, fixed price puts the accountability on the provider to control costs and deliver on the fixed bid while you have less visibility into the project process day-to-day.

Advantages of Time and Material Contract

Here are some potential advantages of using T&M contracts:

1. Flexibility

T&M contracts offer more flexibility to change project scope and requirements, even later in the development cycle. You simply pay for any additional time and resources needed to complete new work.

This is beneficial for projects where requirements are likely to change or remain uncertain when development starts.

2. No Lump Sum Commitment

With T&M, you avoid having to commit to a large, upfront lump sum contract amount before the full scope is clear as you only pay for the actual hours and resources used each month without having to forecast total costs.

3. Transparency

The T&M billing model provides transparency into the work being performed and the time spent. Detailed invoices include hourly rates, the number of hours logged, and task-level descriptions.

4. Pay for Value

You pay for the effort and value received based on time spent, rather than paying a fixed bid that covers projected effort. If the project ends up needing less work, you pay less in the end.

5. No Retainer

Unlike some consulting contracts, no large retainer payment is required upfront before work can begin. You simply pay for time and materials expended each month.

6. Termination Flexibility

It’s easier to pause or terminate a T&M contract if priorities change, versus a fixed-term engagement. You only pay for the work already completed up to the termination date.

Disadvantages of Time and Material Contract

Some cons of T&M contracts to consider before adoption include:

1. Cost Uncertainty

The open-ended nature of T&M pricing leads to uncertainty and risk of cost overruns. Since providers bill for time spent, costs can escalate beyond initial estimates if the project runs longer than expected.

2. Incentivizes Inefficiency

Without a fixed budget, the T&M pricing model provides little incentive for the provider to work efficiently or control costs as the longer tasks take, the more they can bill.

3. Resource Monitoring

You’ll need to closely monitor how resources are utilized to ensure you’re receiving value for the hourly rates charged. However, you have limited control over who is assigned or for how long.

4. Administrative Overhead

Significant administrative effort is required to review and approve detailed invoices for hourly work completed. And costs must be actively managed to stay within budget.

5. Open Ended Timeline

Without a fixed delivery deadline, project timelines can continue dragging out since the provider has less incentive to deliver efficiently within a set timeframe.

When to Use Time and Material Contract

Here’s when you may want to consider using a T&M contract:

The Scope is Unclear or Likely to Change

If the full project scope and specifications are not yet well-defined or are likely to change throughout the project, a time and material contract allows the required flexibility.

The contract can evolve as needed and you only pay for the actual hours worked, so scope creep and requirement changes won’t lead to cost overruns.

You Need a High Degree of Trust and Collaboration

T&M contracts require a high degree of trust and transparency between you and the contractor, as well as mutual accountability.

Ensure that you pick a contractor you have an established relationship with and can rely on for open communication and collaboration.

The Project Has a Lot of Unknowns and Risk

For complex or innovative projects with many unknowns and technology risks, it can be hard to define a fixed project budget upfront.

T&M allows you to mitigate these project risks by paying only for the time spent, rather than sticking to a fixed price based on guesswork.

You Want Flexibility in Scheduling and Resources

Since you pay by the hour for time worked, T&M contracts give you more flexibility in scheduling contractor resources to meet changing needs. You can also readily adjust the payment terms if necessary.

Advantages of Fixed Price Contract

When it comes to fixed-price contracts, here are some of the benefits of employing it:

1. Cost Predictability

Fixed price contracts provide certainty about the total project cost upfront before work begins. This way, you can set and stick to a defined budget without worrying about cost overruns from scope creep.

2. Incentivizes Efficiency

Since the provider must deliver within the fixed amount, it incentivizes them to manage resources efficiently and control costs rather than drag out timelines as the risk of inefficiency falls on them.

3. Defined Timeline

Fixed price contracts include delivery date commitments holding the provider accountable to preset schedules. This ensures timely completion rather than open-ended timelines.

4. Easier Project Accounting

With a single fixed payment amount, project accounting is simpler. There’s no need to manage and approve complex invoices for hourly work completed like with T&M contracts.

5. Greater Provider Commitment

The provider must take responsibility for delivery risks to earn payment. This leads to greater commitment to quality outcomes and managing uncertainties that arise.

Disadvantages of Fixed Price Contract

Conversely, here are some disadvantages of fixed-price contracts to be aware of:

1. Inflexibility

Fixed Price contracts lack the flexibility to change project scope and requirements once set. Modifications require change orders, contract amendments, and price increases.

2. Requirements Rigidity

The provider is only responsible for delivering exactly what is spelled out in the initial specifications and may resist changes. This rigidity can be problematic, especially for projects with ambiguous or dynamic needs.

3. Cost of Change Orders

Pricing change orders under a fixed price contract are typically expensive because they require renegotiating terms. Providers may decide to charge exorbitant fees knowing you have limited options.

4. Milestone Payments

Rather than paying only for the value received to date, fixed price contracts often involve large upfront or milestone payments before work is complete which can strain cash flows.

5. Lack of Visibility

You generally have less visibility into the project progress and how resources are being utilized since payment is not correlated to hours worked like with T&M contracts.

6. Higher Risk Pricing

To account for the added risks they must assume, providers typically build in larger contingency reserves and premiums to fixed price bids, raising costs.

When to Use Fixed Price Contract

A fixed-price contract is a good choice for certain situations. Some of these are:

Requirements are Clear and Unlikely to Change

If you have a well-defined project scope and clear specifications that are unlikely to change substantially throughout the project, a fixed fee contract is a lower risk as the price won’t vary with changing requirements.

You Want Predictability in Budgeting

Fixed price contracts give you predictability in financial planning and budgeting for the project.

You know exactly what the project will cost upfront, making it easier to get internal stakeholder buy-in.

The Project is Low Complexity and Low Risk

For straightforward projects using tried and true technologies and methods, a fixed price ensures the work stays within budget.

Avoid fixed-price contracts for projects with a high level of complexity and risk.

You Prefer a Simple Procurement Process

Fixed price contracts are typically easier to administer than T&M contracts. You don’t need complex time tracking and invoicing making the procurement process much simpler.

You Want to Incentivize Efficiency

With a fixed price, the contractor has the incentive to work efficiently and complete the project under budget because they don’t get paid more for taking longer.

Time and Materials Contract Example

Let’s look at an example to illustrate time and material pricing.

Suppose you hire a software development contractor to build a custom e-commerce website for your small business.

You’ll pay them a negotiated hourly rate for work performed, plus any agreed expenses like hosting fees or licenses.

The contractor estimates the project will take about 200 hours of development work based on your initial specifications, and you agree to an hourly rate of $80/hour for developer time.

After 100 hours of work, the site is halfway completed. But you realize you need to add some new features like an integrated blog and customer portal. These scope changes will take an estimated 50 additional hours.

Since you have a time and materials contract, you simply continue paying the contractor’s hourly rate for the extra time spent on the new features. leading to a project cost increase of 50 x $80 = $4,000.

When the project is completed, the final tally is 260 hours at $80/hour = $20,800. The flexible contract structure allowed you to accommodate shifts in project scope and requirements without renegotiating pricing.

Fixed Price Contract Example

Similarly, let’s look at an example project to understand how fixed-price contracts work.

Assume you need a web development firm to build a 10-page website for their e-commerce business. The site will have standard features like:

• Product Catalog
• Shopping cart
• Checkout process
• Account Registration
• Content management system

Having provided the site specifications upfront, the developer estimates the project will take 150 hours at $100 per hour, so they propose $15,000 as a fixed fee for the entire project.

The quote breaks down the fixed price by milestone:

• Design concepts: $3,000 upfront
• Website build: $7,000 upon internal QA completion
• Testing and launch: $5,000 upon your acceptance

You agree to the terms and sign the contract. This locks in the scope of work and total budget.

During development, you request a new feature to integrate with an accounting system.

The developer quotes an extra $2,000 fixed fee for this new functionality through a formal change order.

Upon the site’s successful launch, you pay the remaining $5,000 balance owed. The final cost is $15,000 + $2,000 for changes = $17,000 fixed price total.

Final Thoughts

Ultimately, whether to use a time and material vs fixed price contract depends on your specific project circumstances and risk preferences.

T&M contracts offer flexibility as project specifications evolve, while fixed-fee contracts provide cost predictability.

You need to consider factors like requirements certainty, project complexity, budget constraints, client-contractor trust, and risk tolerance, then weigh the pros and cons to determine the best contract type for your specific situation.

With open communication and collaboration, you can have a successful project using either approach. Carefully assess which pricing model aligns with your priorities and mitigates your risks.

The right contract structure lays a solid foundation for an optimal client-contractor relationship and shared project success

FAQs